What’s the cost difference between solo and partnered travel?

by gigigriffis

This May, I celebrated my nine-year anniversary of leaving the US to travel full-time.

For about five of those years, I traveled with a partner. Four were solo. And when someone asked recently about the cost difference they should expect when going solo vs. traveling with a partner or friend, I realized I have some pretty good data I can answer that with.

You can find a deep dive on my expenses on the road (and a bunch of real budgets for my time in places like Zagreb, Croatia, Lauterbrunnen, Switzerland, and Playa del Carmen, Mexico) here. And if you’d like to explore the difference between my partnered budgets and my solo budgets, read on.

Housing budget, solo vs. partnered

For partnered travelers, this is the probably biggest savings opportunity. After all, a one-bedroom apartment price divided by two people is half price.

Which is why I was a little surprised that my housing budget wasn’t that much lower as a partnered traveler. 

There a couple reasons for this: 1) By combining our budgets, we could afford nicer, bigger places, so rather than opt for a lower-budget place, we’d often pick a somewhat more expensive one. 2) With two people in the mix, we had two sets of requirements at play, which narrows the number of apartments that work well. If lots of natural light is non-negotiable for me (and it is) and blackout blinds are non-negotiable for a partner, we’re now limited to places that meet both those criteria. As a solo traveler, my list of criteria is shorter and sometimes that means more budget-friendly options.

One example of what the difference in housing costs actually was for me is Split, Croatia. When I visited solo in 2013, I spent $750 on a small studio near old town. When I came back with my partner in 2019, my half of our accommodation was just under $600. So, the difference was $150 (meaning partnered travel saved me 20% in that particular case).

Another somewhat apples to apples comparison is Ljubljana, Slovenia. In 2015, I spent about $417 on housing for a two-week solo stay. Double that for a monthly figure and you get $834. A few years later, back in Ljubljana with my partner, my half of our monthly rental was about $735. That’s a little over $100 less (about 12%) for my partnered stay.

Two more examples off the top of my head:

In Tartu, Estonia, there was a super cute studio that would have been perfect for one person listed around $700 per month. As a partnered traveler, I instead opted for a place a little under $1150 per month, which put my individual spending a little under $675. That’s a $25 difference. 

For a more expensive example, we can look no further than Switzerland, where a studio in Thun would have cost solo me $1500 a month (cringey, but c’est la via) and our actual super-nice one-bedroom apartment ran us about $2200 per month ($1100 for my share). That’s a $400 difference and about 27%.

So, all that to say, for me, traveling with a partner didn’t cut housing costs by half, but did cut them by a smaller margin (around 10 – 25%, on first glance). Nothing to sniff at, but also not the giant leap that you might expect. 

Food costs, solo vs. partnered

For me, food costs actually went up when I started traveling with a partner. A look at my two apples to apples budgets confirms it: Solo in Split, Croatia, I spent about $150 on eating out and about $200 on groceries (mostly fresh market). Partnered in Split, I spent $150 eating out and $350 on groceries. 

Now, it’s worth noting two things: 1) prices may have gone up in the years between those two visits and 2) my dog’s special diet is included in my grocery bill, so this would have bumped my costs up a bit between those two trips.

Still, I think being partnered was a factor in the jump. When we were eating together, I was more likely to cook and buy fancier ingredients. And I was overall more likely to eat out.

I noticed a jump in my grocery spending when we got together, but most of my budgets aren’t an exact comparison, so this is mostly a gut feeling. And I don’t think it’d apply to everyone. If you don’t buy fancier ingredients and do fancier meals, having a partner splitting groceries probably means less food waste and a slightly lower budget overall. 

Transportation costs, solo vs. partnered

Plane travel, train travel, and bus tickets all hold steady whether you’re partnered or solo. The one place where savings can add up is if you use a lot of taxis/car services and/or rent or buy a car or RV. 

For me, this means I saved about 50% on a taxi ride maybe once per month (often we’d get a taxi from the airport or train station on arrival so that we didn’t have to lug our stuff across town). Overall, a pretty negligible difference in my particular case, but for those doing a lot of car renting, this could be a significant savings category.

Supply + entertainment costs, solo vs. partnered

Obviously things like museum tickets, park entrance fees, and other entertainment budget items are mostly individual. Occasionally, there will be a discount for a second person or a two-for-one special, but for the most part this part of my budget holds steady no matter which way I travel. 

Supplies are similar. Toilet paper, dish soap, laundry detergent…they’re all finite, so costs remain pretty steady whether you’re splitting or not. The big exception here is if you are traveling faster and need to buy something and leave most of it behind. For example: If you’re traveling solo and run out of dish soap three days before you leave a place, you buy a whole thing of dish soap for $5 and leave most of it behind. You’re out probably $4.50 of that. Same thing happens when you’re partnered and you’re only out $2.25. The numbers on this are generally small, but they can add up, especially if you’re traveling fast. 

Other expenses on the road

Other expenses like healthcare and health insurance, business expenses, replacing personal items like clothes and shoes, etc. are obviously separate. Movie rentals and subscriptions like Netflix or a VPN may drop by 50% since you’re splitting costs. And there are some things you can share (screen cleaning cloths for computers, for example, tweezers, cloth grocery bags, a sharp kitchen knife), reducing both cost and weight. Yet again, these are pretty small expenses, but can add up over time, especially for those on very tight budgets.

So, how much does partnered travel really save you?

This will depend largely on you and your partner’s preferences and the way you travel (car vs. train, for example, and luxury vs. dirtbag).

Traveling with someone who loves luxury when before you were dirtbagging it? Your expenses might go up. If you’re renting the exact same apartments, but now with two instead of one, you’re probably cutting your apartment budget in half. And if you, like I, use partnered travel as an excuse to rent nicer, larger places, you may land where I did, saving somewhere between 10% and 25% on housing and probably keeping most of your other budget categories relatively stable. 

Any math on the exact difference between my solo and partnered budgets will be imperfect because there are other factors involved: different destinations have different costs, some of the budgets are years apart (and inflation may be at play making the gap larger or smaller), etc.

That said, I did do the math on 38 budgets to see how total expenses stacked up in the partnered vs. solo travel battle. 23 of the budgets I reviewed were partnered. 15 were solo.

Of the partnered budgets, 52% were under $1500 for a month. 26% were between $1500 and $1800. And 22% were over $1800 for a month. The average of those 23 budgets was $1518 per month.

Of the solo budgets, 40% were under $1500 for a month. 20% came in between $1500 and $1800. And 40% were over $1800. The average of those 15 budgets was $1667.

The savings difference between the those two averages is 9%. Meaning: for me, partnered travel was 9% less than going it alone (on average).

Long-term, those numbers add up. Over the course of a year, that’s about $1800 in savings (based on the budget numbers above). In five years, it’s $9000. 

Dig into my travel budgets

Want to peek at all my travel budgets – partnered and solo? Here they all are. Scroll down to the notes below any budget to see if it was solo or partnered and what those numbers represent. 

And if you’d just like to look at my solo budgets? Here they are:

Croatia

Split, Croatia

Zagreb, Croatia (on a tight budget)

Zagreb, Croatia (splurging)

Slovenia

Ljubljana, Slovenia

Kobarid, Slovenia

Spain

Toledo, Spain

Nerja, Spain

Scotland

Edinburgh, Scotland

Italy & France

Perugia, Italy

Biarritz, France

Paris, France

Chamonix, France

Cycling across France

Switzerland & Austria

Lauterbrunnen, Switzerland

Innsbruck, Austria

North America

Flagstaff, Arizona, USA

Sayulita, Mexico

Playa del Carmen, Mexico


Have a similar (or wildly different) experience to share? Drop a comment. Would love to hear from others who’ve gone from solo to partnered (or vice versa) about how it impacted your budgets.

Share this post!

You may also like

Leave a comment

* By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Opt-out here if you wish! Accept Read more

shares